Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun 1:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.JNS171906. [Epub ahead of print]

Isolated subdural hematomas in mild traumatic brain injury. Part 2: a preliminary clinical decision support tool for neurosurgical intervention.

Author information

1
1Trauma Research Department and.
2
4Trauma Research Department, St. Anthony Hospital, Lakewood, Colorado.
3
6Trauma Research Department, Penrose Hospital, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
4
3Department of Neurosurgery and.
5
2Department of Neurosurgery, Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, Colorado.
6
5Trauma Research Department, Medical City Plano, Plano, Texas.
7
7Trauma Services Department, Research Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri; and.
8
8Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, Colorado.

Abstract

OBJECTIVEA paucity of studies have examined neurosurgical interventions in the mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) population with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Furthermore, it is not understood how the dimensions of an ICH relate to the risk of a neurosurgical intervention. These limitations contribute to a lack of treatment guidelines. Isolated subdural hematomas (iSDHs) are the most prevalent ICH in mTBI, carry the highest neurosurgical intervention rate, and account for an overwhelming majority of all neurosurgical interventions. Decision criteria in this population could benefit from understanding the risk of requiring neurosurgical intervention. The aim of this study was to quantify the risk of neurosurgical intervention based on the dimensions of an iSDH in the setting of mTBI.METHODSThis was a 3.5-year, retrospective observational cohort study at a Level I trauma center. All adult (≥ 18 years) trauma patients with mTBI and iSDH were included in the study. Maximum length and thickness (in mm) of acute SDHs, the presence of acute-on-chronic (AOC) SDH, mass effect, and other hemorrhage-related variables were double-data entered; discrepant results were adjudicated after a maximum of 4 reviews. Patients with coagulopathy, skull fractures, no acute hemorrhage, a non-SDH ICH, or who did not undergo imaging on admission were excluded. Tentorial SDHs were not measured. The primary outcome was neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, burr holes, intracranial pressure monitor placement, shunt, ventriculostomy, or SDH evacuation). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression was used to identify significant covariates, to assess interactions, and to create the scoring system.RESULTSThere were a total of 176 patients included in our study: 28 patients did and 148 did not receive a neurosurgical intervention. There were no significant differences between neurosurgical intervention groups in 11 demographic and 22 comorbid variables. Patients with neurosurgical intervention had significantly longer and thicker SDHs than nonsurgical controls. Logistic regression identified thickness and AOC hemorrhage as being the most important variables in predicting neurosurgical intervention; SDH length was not. Risk of neurosurgical intervention was calculated based on the SDH thickness and presence of an AOC hemorrhage from a multivariable logistic regression model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97; p < 0.001). With a decision point of 2.35% risk, we predicted neurosurgical intervention with 100% sensitivity, 100% negative predictive value, and 53% specificity.CONCLUSIONSThis is the first study to quantify the risk of neurosurgical intervention based on hemorrhage characteristics in patients with mTBI and iSDH. Once validated in a second population, these data can be used to inform the necessity of interhospital transfers and neurosurgical consultations.

KEYWORDS:

AIS = Abbreviated Injury Scale; AOC = acute-on-chronic; AUROC = area under the receiver operating characteristic; CCHR = Canadian CT Head Rule; ED = emergency department; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; ISS = Injury Severity Score; IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage; NOC = New Orleans Criteria for Positive Head CT Scan; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; iSDH = isolated subdural hematoma; mTBI = mild traumatic brain injury; mild; neurosurgical intervention; predictive modeling; subdural hematoma; traumatic brain injury

PMID:
29905511
DOI:
10.3171/2018.1.JNS171906

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Sheridan PubFactory
Loading ...
Support Center