Format

Send to

Choose Destination
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):e133. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7362.

Digital Health Intervention for Asthma: Patient-Reported Value and Usability.

Author information

1
Dignity Health Woodland Clinic Medical Group, Woodland, CA, United States.
2
Dignity Health Mercy Medical Group, Sacramento, CA, United States.
3
Propeller Health, Research and Development, San Francisco, CA, United States.
4
University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
5
Propeller Health, Research and Development, Madison, WI, United States.
#
Contributed equally

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Although digital health tools are increasingly recognized as effective in improving clinical outcomes such as asthma control and medication adherence, few studies have assessed patient experiences and perception of value.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, perception of usability and value, and desire to continue after 12 months of using a digital health intervention to support asthma management.

METHODS:

Participants were enrolled in a randomized controlled study evaluating the impact of a digital health platform for asthma management. Participants used electronic inhaler sensors to track medication use and accessed their information in a digital health platform. Electronic surveys were administered to intervention arm participants aged 12 years and older after 12 months of use. The survey assessed asthma control, patient satisfaction with the sensor device, and perception of the usability and value of the digital health platform through closed-ended and open-ended questions. Logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of participants' characteristics on survey completion, satisfaction, and perception of value.

RESULTS:

Of the 207 intervention arm participants aged 12 years and older, 89 submitted survey responses (42.9% response rate). Of these 89 participants, 70 reported being very satisfied (79%, 70/89) or somewhat satisfied (20%, 18/89) with the inhaler sensor device. Moreover, 93% (83/89) expressed satisfaction with the reports, and 90% (80/89) found the information from the reports useful for learning about their asthma. In addition, 72% (64/89) of the participants reported that they were interested in continuing to use the sensor and platform beyond the study. There were no significant differences in satisfaction with the device or the platform across participants' characteristics, including device type, age, sex, insurance type, asthma control, or syncing history; however, participants with smartphones and longer participation were more likely to take the survey.

CONCLUSIONS:

Electronic sensors and a digital health platform were well received by participants who reported satisfaction and perceived value. These results were consistent across multiple participants' characteristics. These findings can add to a limited literature to keep improving digital health interventions and ensure the meaningful and enduring impact on patient outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

asthma; mHealth; patient satisfaction; perception; self-management; surveys and questionnaires

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for JMIR Publications Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center