Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nat Nanotechnol. 2018 Jul;13(7):618. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0137-8.

Publisher Correction: Direct imaging of the electron liquid at oxide interfaces.

Author information

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Republic of Korea.
2
Materials Modeling and Characterization Department, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon, Republic of Korea.
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
4
Department of Physics and Astronomy & Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.
5
Department of Physics, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
6
Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon, Republic of Korea.
7
Center for Integrated Nanostructure Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Republic of Korea.
8
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Engineering (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
9
UNIST Central Research Facilities (UCRF), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Engineering (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
10
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
11
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Republic of Korea. sanghooh@skku.edu.
12
Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon, Republic of Korea. sanghooh@skku.edu.

Abstract

In the version of this Letter originally published, in two instances in Fig. 1 the layers in the cross-sectional view of the (001) interface were incorrectly labelled: in Fig. 1b SrO+ should have read SrO0; in Fig. 1c LaO+, AlO2-, LaO+, TiO20, SrO+, TiO20 should have read LaO33-, Al3+, LaO33-, Ti4+, SrO34-, Ti4+. In Fig. 3c the upper-right equation read -σs = -e/2a2 but should have read -σs = e/2a2 and in Fig. 3f the lower-right equation read -σs = -e/2√3a2 but should have read σs = -e/2√3a2. These errors have now been corrected in the online version of the Letter.

PMID:
29849186
DOI:
10.1038/s41565-018-0137-8

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center