Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2018 May 25;13(5):e0197747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197747. eCollection 2018.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.

Author information

1
Statesia, Le Mans, France.
2
ICURE Search, Outcomerea, Paris, France.
3
University Hospital of Poitiers, Emergency Department and Pre-Hospital Care, Poitiers, France.
4
Infection Control Unit, AP-HP, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France.
5
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
6
Adults Intensive Care Unit, Ongoing Monitoring Unit, Clermont Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
7
Intensive Care Unit, Clermont Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
8
Paris Diderot University - Bichat University hospital - Medical and Infectious Diseases Intensive care unit, Paris, France.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of skin antiseptic solutions (chlorhexidine-alcohol (CHG) versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution (PVI)) for the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in intensive care unit (ICU) in France based on an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (CLEAN).

DESIGN:

A 100-day time semi-markovian model was performed to be fitted to longitudinal individual patient data from CLEAN database. This model includes eight health states and probabilistic sensitivity analyses on cost and effectiveness were performed. Costs of intensive care unit stay are based on a French multicentre study and the cost-effectiveness criterion is the cost per patient with catheter-related bloodstream infection avoided.

PATIENTS:

2,349 patients (age≥18 years) were analyzed to compare the 1-time CHG group (CHG-T1, 588 patients), the 4-time CHG group (CHG-T4, 580 patients), the 1-time PVI group (PVI-T1, 587 patients), and the 4-time PVI group (PVI-T4, 594 patients).

INTERVENTION:

2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) compared to 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (povidone iodine-alcohol).

RESULTS:

The mean cost per alive, discharged or dead patient was of €23,798 (95% confidence interval: €20,584; €34,331), €21,822 (€18,635; €29,701), €24,874 (€21,011; €31,678), and €24,201 (€20,507; €29,136) for CHG-T1, CHG-T4, PVI-T1, and PVI-T4, respectively. The mean number of patients with CRBSI per 1000 patients was of 3.49 (0.42; 12.57), 6.82 (1.86; 17.38), 26.04 (14.64; 42.58), and 23.05 (12.32; 39.09) for CHG-T1, CHG-T4, PVI-T1, and PVI-T4, respectively. In comparison to the 1-time PVI solution, the 1-time CHG solution avoids 22.55 CRBSI /1,000 patients, and saves €1,076 per patient. This saving is not statistically significant at a 0.05 level because of the overlap of 95% confidence intervals for mean costs per patient in each group. Conversely, the difference in effectiveness between the CHG-T1 solution and the PVI-T1 solution is statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CHG-T1 solution is more effective at the same cost than the PVI-T1 solution. CHG-T1, CHG-T4 and PVI-T4 solutions are statistically comparable for cost and effectiveness. This study is based on the data from the RCT from 11 French intensive care units registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01629550).

PMID:
29799871
PMCID:
PMC5969756
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0197747
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

We have the following interests. This study was funded by Becton Dickinson France OM, http://www.bd.com/fr/. FM is the CEO of Statesia, SR is the scientific CEO of ICURE Search and CF is a self-employed person who works with Statesia. A service agreement (commercial contract) was arranged between Becton Dickinson and Statesia. The assessed chlorhexidine-alcohol solution is a product marketed by Becton Dickinson. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center