Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Justice. 2018 May 15;6(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0070-9.

Perceived importance of substance use prevention in juvenile justice: a multi-level analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Room 570, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. jmcderm@emory.edu.
2
Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 78, New York City, NY, 10032, USA.
3
Texas Christian University, 3034 Sandage Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas, 76129, USA.
4
Mississippi State University, 1 Research Blvd., Suite 103, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA.
5
National Institute on Drug Abuse, Frankfort, USA.
6
University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 204, Lexington, KY, 40508, United States.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Youth under juvenile justice (JJ) supervision are at high-risk of adverse outcomes from substance use, making prevention important. Few studies have examined prevention-related attitudes of JJ employees, yet such attitudes may be important for implementing prevention programs. Attitudes toward prevention may reflect individual characteristics and organizational contexts.

METHODS:

Mixed effects regression was used to analyze data from 492 employees in 36 sites participating in the Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS) cooperative agreement. JJ employees' perceived importance of substance use prevention was measured. Staff-level variables included attitudes, job type, and demographic characteristics. Site-level variables focused on use of evidence-based screening tools, prevention programs, and drug testing.

RESULTS:

On average, JJ employees rated substance use prevention as highly important (mean = 45.9, out of 50). JJ employees generally agreed that preventing substance use was part of their agency's responsibility (mean = 3.8 on scale ranging from 1 to 5). At the site level, 72.2% used an evidence-based screening tool, 22.2% used one or more evidence-based prevention program, and 47.2% used drug testing. Reported importance of prevention was positively associated with site-level use of screening tools and drug testing as well as staff-level attitudes regarding prevention being consistent with the agency's mission.

CONCLUSIONS:

The associations between screening and prevention attitudes suggest that commitment to identifying youth needs may result in greater openness to preventing substance use. Future efforts to implement substance use prevention within JJ agencies charged with supervising youth in the community may benefit from highlighting the fit between prevention and the agency's mission.

KEYWORDS:

Community supervision; Juvenile justice; Substance use prevention

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center