Sustained Effectiveness of Cilostazol After Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions: Midterm Follow-up From the Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol (STOP-IC) Study

J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Jun;25(3):306-312. doi: 10.1177/1526602818771358. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the midterm safety and effectiveness of cilostazol treatment in claudicant patients undergoing endovascular therapy.

Methods: The Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol (STOP-IC) study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00912756; University Hospital Medical Information Network identifier UMIN000002091) enrolled 200 patients (mean age 73 years; 131 men) treated for femoropopliteal disease from March 2009 to April 2011 at 13 cardiovascular centers in Japan. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive oral aspirin with or without cilostazol. Of the 100 patients assigned to the 2 treatment groups, 7 patients in the cilostazol group and 2 patients in the no-cilostazol group were withdrawn from the study without undergoing endovascular treatment, leaving 93 patients in the cilostazol group and 98 patients in the no-cilostazol group for follow-up analysis. The primary outcome measure was primary patency; secondary outcome measures were freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and overall survival. Outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis using the Kaplan-Meier method; estimates were compared with the log-rank test.

Results: The median follow-up was 38.1 months (interquartile range 25.1, 47.7). Among the 93 subjects in the cilostazol group, 7 died and 26 withdrew from administration 1 year after the endovascular procedure. Discontinuation of cilostazol was not a significant factor for restenosis. Primary patency was significantly higher in the cilostazol group than in the no-cilostazol group (69% vs 54%, p=0.026) at 3 years. The cilostazol group also had better 3-year freedom from CD-TLR (78% vs 63%, p=0.014), although overall survival estimates did not differ significantly (p=0.95).

Conclusion: These results suggest that the safety and effectiveness of cilostazol treatment were sustained in patients with femoropopliteal disease undergoing endovascular treatment.

Keywords: balloon angioplasty; cilostazol; femoropopliteal segment; mortality; patency; peripheral artery disease; popliteal artery; restenosis; superficial femoral artery; target lesion revascularization.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angioplasty, Balloon* / adverse effects
  • Angioplasty, Balloon* / instrumentation
  • Cardiovascular Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Cardiovascular Agents / adverse effects
  • Cilostazol / administration & dosage*
  • Cilostazol / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery / drug effects*
  • Femoral Artery / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Intermittent Claudication / drug therapy*
  • Intermittent Claudication / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / physiopathology
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / therapy*
  • Popliteal Artery / drug effects*
  • Popliteal Artery / physiopathology
  • Recurrence
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Patency / drug effects

Substances

  • Cardiovascular Agents
  • Cilostazol

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00912756