Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes.

Author information

1
Silver Cross Hospital, 1890 Silver Cross Blvd, Suite 410, New Lenox, IL, 60451, USA. rezagamagami@comcast.net.
2
Hillcrest Medical Center and Oklahoma Physician Group, Tulsa, OK, USA.
3
Department of General and Bariatric Surgery, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
4
ValleyCare Health System of Ohio, Trumbull Memorial Hospital, Warren, OH, USA.
5
Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
6
Providence Park Hospital, Novi, MI, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare the perioperative outcomes of initial, consecutive robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR) cases with consecutive open cases completed by the same surgeons.

METHODS:

Multicenter, retrospective, comparative study of perioperative results from open and robotic IHR using standard univariate and multivariate regression analyses for propensity score matched (1:1) cohorts.

RESULTS:

Seven general surgeons at six institutions contributed 602 consecutive open IHR and 652 consecutive R-TAPP IHR cases. Baseline patient characteristics in the unmatched groups were similar with the exception of previous abdominal surgery and all baseline characteristics were comparable in the matched cohorts. In matched analyses, postoperative complications prior to discharge were comparable. However, from post discharge through 30 days, fewer patients experienced complications in the R-TAPP group than in the open group [4.3% vs 7.7% (p = 0.047)]. The R-TAPP group had no reoperations post discharge through 30 days of follow-up compared with five patients (1.1%) in the open group (p = 0.062), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis which demonstrated patient age > 65 years and the open approach were risk factors for complications within 30 days post discharge in the matched group [age > 65 years: odds ratio (OR) = 3.33 (95% CI 1.89, 5.87; p < 0.0001); open approach: OR = 1.89 (95% CI 1.05, 3.38; p = 0.031)].

CONCLUSIONS:

In this matched analysis, R-TAPP provides similar postoperative complications prior to discharge and a lower rate of postoperative complications through 30 days compared to open repair. R-TAPP is a promising and reproducible approach, and may facilitate adoption of minimally invasive repairs of inguinal hernias.

KEYWORDS:

Inguinal hernia repair; Open; Robotic; TAPP

PMID:
29700716
DOI:
10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center