Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Clin Respir J. 2018 Apr 15;5(1):1458560. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2018.1458560. eCollection 2018.

Health care resource utilization and characteristics of patients with eosinophilic asthma in secondary health care in Finland.

Author information

1
Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
2
AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden.
3
Auria Biobank, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
4
AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
5
Medaffcon Oy, Espoo, Finland.

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is common in asthma patients and appears to be associated with severe exacerbations and loss of asthma control. Objective: To describe the resource utilization and clinical characteristics of patients with eosinophilic asthma. Design: Asthma patients ≥18 years with ≥1 blood eosinophil count in secondary care (South West Finland) during 2003‒2013 were included. Clinical characteristics (age, lung function, body mass index, and comorbidities) and asthma-related resource utilization (hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and emergency room [ER] visits) were retrieved. Resource utilization rates were compared for patients with blood eosinophil ≤ or >300 cells/μL, using adjusted negative binomial regression models. Results: Overall, 4,357 eligible patients were identified (mean age 60 years, females 68%), of which 1,927 (44%) had >300 eosinophil cells/μL blood. Patients with ≤300 and >300 eosinophil counts, exhibited similar clinical characteristics, including advanced age, poor lung function, and overweight. Comorbidities such as pneumonia, sinusitis, and nasal polyps, were more frequent among those with >300 eosinophil cells/μL blood compared with patients with lower counts. Eosinophil counts >300 cells/μL were associated with greater hospital admissions (rate ratio [RR] [95% confidence interval CI]: 1.13 [1.02;1.24]) and outpatient visits (RR [95% CI]: 1.11 [1.03;1.20]) compared with patients with lower eosinophil counts. Rates of ER visits were similar between the patient groups (RR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.87;1.12]). Conclusions: Hospital admissions and outpatient visits occurred more often for patients with eosinophil counts >300 cells/µL, than for patients with lower eosinophil counts. Routine blood eosinophil screening might be useful to identify patients with an eosinophilic phenotype eligible for more targeted treatments.

KEYWORDS:

Eosinophil; asthma; medical record data; observational study; resource utilization

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center