Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1504-1511. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1527-6.

Are two spaces better than one? The effect of spacing following periods and commas during reading.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866, USA. rjohnso1@skidmore.edu.
2
Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866, USA.

Abstract

The most recent edition of the American Psychological Association (APA) Manual states that two spaces should follow the punctuation at the end of a sentence. This is in contrast to the one-space requirement from previous editions. However, to date, there has been no empirical support for either convention. In the current study, participants performed (1) a typing task to assess spacing usage and (2) an eye-tracking experiment to assess the effect that punctuation spacing has on reading performance. Although comprehension was not affected by punctuation spacing, the eye movement record suggested that initial processing of the text was facilitated when periods were followed by two spaces, supporting the change made to the APA Manual. Individuals' typing usage also influenced these effects such that those who use two spaces following a period showed the greatest overall facilitation from reading with two spaces.

KEYWORDS:

eye-tracking; punctuation; reading; spacing

PMID:
29691763
DOI:
10.3758/s13414-018-1527-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center