Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Microorganisms. 2018 Apr 21;6(2). pii: E32. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6020032.

Coping with Environmental Eukaryotes; Identification of Pseudomonas syringae Genes during the Interaction with Alternative Hosts or Predators.

Author information

1
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR, UK. f.dorati83@gmail.com.
2
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR, UK. glyn.barrett@reading.ac.uk.
3
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA1 9BJ, UK. mariasancon@gmail.com.
4
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR, UK. tanya.arseneault@canada.ca.
5
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Research and Development Centre, Quebec, J3B 3E6, Canada. tanya.arseneault@canada.ca.
6
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR, UK. matsjg@gmail.com.
7
School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK. d.j.studholme@exeter.ac.uk.
8
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31192 Mutilva, Spain. jesus.murillo@unavarra.es.
9
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31192 Mutilva, Spain. pcm92@unavarra.es.
10
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA1 9BJ, UK. n.r.waterfield@warwick.ac.uk.
11
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK. n.r.waterfield@warwick.ac.uk.
12
Centre for Research in Bioscience, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK. dawn.arnold@uwe.ac.uk.
13
School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AX, UK. e.j.shaw@reading.ac.uk.
14
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR, UK. r.w.jackson@reading.ac.uk.

Abstract

Understanding the molecular mechanisms underpinning the ecological success of plant pathogens is critical to develop strategies for controlling diseases and protecting crops. Recent observations have shown that plant pathogenic bacteria, particularly Pseudomonas, exist in a range of natural environments away from their natural plant host e.g., water courses, soil, non-host plants. This exposes them to a variety of eukaryotic predators such as nematodes, insects and amoebae present in the environment. Nematodes and amoeba in particular are bacterial predators while insect herbivores may act as indirect predators, ingesting bacteria on plant tissue. We therefore postulated that bacteria are probably under selective pressure to avoid or survive predation and have therefore developed appropriate coping mechanisms. We tested the hypothesis that plant pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae are able to cope with predation pressure and found that three pathovars show weak, but significant resistance or toxicity. To identify the gene systems that contribute to resistance or toxicity we applied a heterologous screening technique, called Rapid Virulence Annotation (RVA), for anti-predation and toxicity mechanisms. Three cosmid libraries for P. syringae pv. aesculi, pv. tomato and pv. phaseolicola, of approximately 2000 cosmids each, were screened in the susceptible/non-toxic bacterium Escherichia coli against nematode, amoebae and an insect. A number of potential conserved and unique genes were identified which included genes encoding haemolysins, biofilm formation, motility and adhesion. These data provide the first multi-pathovar comparative insight to how plant pathogens cope with different predation pressures and infection of an insect gut and provide a foundation for further study into the function of selected genes and their role in ecological success.

KEYWORDS:

Acanthamoeba polyphaga; Caenorhabditis elegans; Galleria mellonella; Pseudomonas syringae; RVA; anti-predation; pathogen; rapid virulence annotation

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center