Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;32:107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 17.

Assessment of culture and environment in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Rationale, description of measures, and early data.

Author information

1
Addiction Center and Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States. Electronic address: zuckerra@med.umich.edu.
2
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33145, United States. Electronic address: raul.gonzalezjr@fiu.edu.
3
Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, M/C DC7P, Portland, OR 97239, United States. Electronic address: feldstei@ohsu.edu.
4
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 S Yale Ave, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326, United States. Electronic address: mpaulus@laureateinstitute.org.
5
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane Room 2011, Rockville, MD, United States. Electronic address: jarroyo@mail.nih.gov.
6
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, United States. Electronic address: afuligni@ucla.edu.
7
Laureate Institute for Brain Research & Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, United States. Electronic address: amanda.morris@okstate.edu.
8
Center for Research on US Latino HIV/AIDS & Drug Abuse, Florida International University, United States. Electronic address: msanche@fiu.edu.
9
University of Hawaii, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, United States. Electronic address: TWills@cc.hawaii.edu.

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental maturation takes place in a social environment in addition to a neurobiological one. Characterization of social environmental factors that influence this process is therefore an essential component in developing an accurate model of adolescent brain and neurocognitive development, as well as susceptibility to change with the use of marijuana and other drugs. The creation of the Culture and Environment (CE) measurement component of the ABCD protocol was guided by this understanding. Three areas were identified by the CE Work Group as central to this process: influences relating to CE Group membership, influences created by the proximal social environment, influences stemming from social interactions. Eleven measures assess these influences, and by time of publication, will have been administered to well over 7,000 9-10 year-old children and one of their parents. Our report presents baseline data on psychometric characteristics (mean, standard deviation, range, skewness, coefficient alpha) of all measures within the battery. Effectiveness of the battery in differentiating 9-10 year olds who were classified as at higher and lower risk for marijuana use in adolescence was also evaluated. Psychometric characteristics on all measures were good to excellent; higher vs. lower risk contrasts were significant in areas where risk differentiation would be anticipated.

KEYWORDS:

Acculturation; Cultural identity; Family effects; Social interaction; Substance use

PMID:
29627333
DOI:
10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center