Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 16;9:535. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00535. eCollection 2018.

Specific Inhibition of Complement Activation Significantly Ameliorates Autoimmune Blistering Disease in Mice.

Author information

1
Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
2
Institute of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
3
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Cheshire, CT, United States.
4
Departments of Medicine and Immunology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, United States.
5
Systems Immunity Research Institute, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
6
Institute for Systemic Inflammation Research, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
7
Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is an antibody-mediated blistering skin disease associated with tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies to type VII collagen (COL7). Transfer of antibodies against COL7 into mice results in a subepidermal blistering phenotype, strictly depending on the complement component C5. Further, activation predominantly by the alternative pathway is required to induce experimental EBA, as blistering was delayed and significantly ameliorated only in factor B-/- mice. However, C5 deficiency not only blocked the activation of terminal complement components and assembly of the membrane attack complex (MAC) but also eliminated the formation of C5a. Therefore, in the present study, we first aimed to elucidate which molecules downstream of C5 are relevant for blister formation in this EBA model and could be subsequently pharmaceutically targeted. For this purpose, we injected mice deficient in C5a receptor 1 (C5aR1) or C6 with antibodies to murine COL7. Importantly, C5ar1-/- mice were significantly protected from experimental EBA, demonstrating that C5a-C5aR1 interactions are critical intermediates linking pathogenic antibodies to tissue damage in this experimental model of EBA. By contrast, C6-/- mice developed widespread blistering disease, suggesting that MAC is dispensable for blister formation in this model. In further experiments, we tested the therapeutic potential of inhibitors of complement components which were identified to play a key role in this experimental model. Complement components C5, factor B (fB), and C5aR1 were specifically targeted using complement inhibitors both prophylactically and in mice that had already developed disease. All complement inhibitors led to a significant improvement of the blistering phenotype when injected shortly before anti-COL7 antibodies. To simulate a therapeutic intervention, anti-fB treatment was first administered in full-blown EBA (day 5) and induced significant amelioration only in the final phase of disease evolution, suggesting that early intervention in disease development may be necessary to achieve higher efficacy. Anti-C5 treatment in incipient EBA (day 2) significantly ameliorated disease during the whole experiment. This finding is therapeutically relevant, since the humanized anti-C5 antibody eculizumab is already successfully used in patients. In conclusion, in this study, we have identified promising candidate molecules for complement-directed therapeutic intervention in EBA and similar autoantibody-mediated diseases.

KEYWORDS:

autoantibodies; autoimmune diseases; complement; complement inhibition; immunotherapy

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center