Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 21;13(3):e0192461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192461. eCollection 2018.

The distribution of income is worse than you think: Including pollution impacts into measures of income inequality.

Author information

1
Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
2
National Bureau of Economic Research., Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
3
Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
4
Department of Economics, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.
5
ECONW, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

Abstract

This paper calculates the distribution of an adjusted measure of income that deducts damages due to exposure to air pollution from reported market income in the United States from 2011 to 2014. The Gini coefficient for this measure of adjusted income is 0.682 in 2011, as compared to 0.482 for market income. By 2014, we estimate that the Gini for adjusted income fell to 0.646, while the market income Gini did not appreciably change. The inclusion of air pollution damage acts like a regressive tax: with air pollution, the bottom 20% of households lose roughly 10% of the share of income, while the top 20% of households gain 10%. We find that, unlike the case for market income, New England is not the most unequal division with respect to adjusted income. Further, the difference between adjusted income for white and Hispanics is smaller than expected. However, the gap in augmented income between whites and African-Americans is widening.

PMID:
29561838
PMCID:
PMC5862398
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0192461
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center