Format

Send to

Choose Destination
JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1113-1124. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0162.

Quality of Health Care for Children in Australia, 2012-2013.

Author information

1
Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
2
Centre for Population Health Research, Sansom Institute for Health Research, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
3
Australian Patient Safety Foundation, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
4
School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
5
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
6
Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
7
Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
8
Kids Research Institute, Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
9
Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
10
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
11
Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
12
Division of Paediatric Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
13
Russell Clinic, Blackwood, South Australia, Australia.
14
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
15
Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
16
New South Wales Ministry of Health, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
17
Clinical Excellence Division, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
18
International Society for Quality in Health Care, Dublin, Ireland.
19
Bupa Health Foundation Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
20
New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia.
21
Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
22
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
23
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
24
The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
25
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Abstract

Importance:

The quality of routine care for children is rarely assessed, and then usually in single settings or for single clinical conditions.

Objective:

To estimate the quality of health care for children in Australia in inpatient and ambulatory health care settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants:

Multistage stratified sample with medical record review to assess adherence with quality indicators extracted from clinical practice guidelines for 17 common, high-burden clinical conditions (noncommunicable [n = 5], mental health [n = 4], acute infection [n = 7], and injury [n = 1]), such as asthma, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, tonsillitis, and head injury. For these 17 conditions, 479 quality indicators were identified, with the number varying by condition, ranging from 9 for eczema to 54 for head injury. Four hundred medical records were targeted for sampling for each of 15 conditions while 267 records were targeted for anxiety and 133 for depression. Within each selected medical record, all visits for the 17 targeted conditions were identified, and separate quality assessments made for each. Care was evaluated for 6689 children 15 years of age and younger who had 15 240 visits to emergency departments, for inpatient admissions, or to pediatricians and general practitioners in selected urban and rural locations in 3 Australian states. These visits generated 160 202 quality indicator assessments.

Exposures:

Quality indicators were identified through a systematic search of local and international guidelines. Individual indicators were extracted from guidelines and assessed using a 2-stage Delphi process.

Main Outcomes and Measures:

Quality of care for each clinical condition and overall.

Results:

Of 6689 children with surveyed medical records, 53.6% were aged 0 to 4 years and 55.5% were male. Adherence to quality of care indicators was estimated at 59.8% (95% CI, 57.5%-62.0%; n = 160 202) across the 17 conditions, ranging from a high of 88.8% (95% CI, 83.0%-93.1%; n = 2638) for autism to a low of 43.5% (95% CI, 36.8%-50.4%; n = 2354) for tonsillitis. The mean adherence by condition category was estimated as 60.5% (95% CI, 57.2%-63.8%; n = 41 265) for noncommunicable conditions (range, 52.8%-75.8%); 82.4% (95% CI, 79.0%-85.5%; n = 14 622) for mental health conditions (range, 71.5%-88.8%); 56.3% (95% CI, 53.2%-59.4%; n = 94 037) for acute infections (range, 43.5%-69.8%); and 78.3% (95% CI, 75.1%-81.2%; n = 10 278) for injury.

Conclusions and Relevance:

Among a sample of children receiving care in Australia in 2012-2013, the overall prevalence of adherence to quality of care indicators for important conditions was not high. For many of these conditions, the quality of care may be inadequate.

PMID:
29558552
PMCID:
PMC5885883
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2018.0162
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center