Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194673. eCollection 2018.

Validation of a prognostic score for hidden cancer in unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Author information

1
Department of Pneumonology, Medical Surgical Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
2
Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
3
Statistics, Methodology and Research Evaluation Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
4
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Consorci Hospitalari de Mataró, Barcelona, Spain.
6
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Olot i Comarcal de la Garrotxa, Gerona, Spain.
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Sant Pau i Santa Tecla, Tarragona, Spain.
8
Vascular Medicine and Haemostasis, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
9
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol de Badalona, Barcelona, Universidad Católica de Murcia, Spain.

Abstract

The usefulness of a diagnostic workup for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Trombo Embólica) database to perform a nested case-control study to validate a prognostic score that identifies patients with unprovoked VTE at increased risk for cancer. We dichotomized patients as having low- (≤2 points) or high (≥3 points) risk for cancer, and tried to validate the score at 12 and 24 months. From January 2014 to October 2016, 11,695 VTE patients were recruited. Of these, 1,360 with unprovoked VTE (11.6%) were eligible for the study. At 12 months, 52 patients (3.8%; 95%CI: 2.9-5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients (67%) scoring ≤2 points, 22 (2.4%) had cancer. Among 455 scoring ≥3 points, 30 (6.6%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.8; 95%CI 1.6-5; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.63 (95%CI 0.55-0.71). At 24 months, 58 patients (4.3%; 95%CI: 3.3-5.5%) were diagnosed with cancer. Among 905 patients scoring ≤2 points, 26 (2.9%) had cancer. Among 455 patients scoring ≥3 points, 32 (7%) had cancer (hazard ratio 2.6; 95%CI 1.5-4.3; p<0.01). C-statistic was 0.61 (95%CI, 0.54-0.69). We validated our prognostic score at 12 and 24 months, although prospective cohort validation is needed. This may help to identify patients for whom more extensive screening workup may be required.

PMID:
29558509
PMCID:
PMC5860754
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0194673
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center