Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Diagnosis (Berl). 2017 Jun 27;4(2):87-91. doi: 10.1515/dx-2016-0045.

"Dr. Google" and his predecessors.

Author information

1
Victoria University of Wellington - Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, PO Box 7625, Wellington 6242, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Contemporary medicine has expressed concern about lay incursions into the diagnostic process buttressed by commonly available medical information on line. Even while the world wide web is a new structure, there is a long historical precedent for this concern. With the emergence of scientific medicine in the late 19th century came a strong belief in the role of diagnosis, not only to explain disease symptoms but also to differentiate the physician from a range of other unreliable practitioners. Along with this focus on diagnosis came also a concern expressed by doctors about patients' inclination to self-diagnose, or to propose candidate diagnoses for the problems that ailed them.

METHODS:

This paper uses Zerubavel's social patterning method. Using material written by doctors from the late 19th until the mid-20th century, I explore comments about, and attitudes towards, self-diagnosis.

RESULTS:

Three areas of concern about self-diagnosis are expressed by doctors. First, self-diagnosis produces anxiety in the patient. Second, it interferes with doctor-patient relationship. Finally self-diagnosis is commonly linked to commercial interests.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contemporary concerns about self-diagnosis are part of an ongoing social pattern, which simultaneously promotes diagnosis as means for explaining disease but also protests when the diagnostic explanations originate with the patient.

KEYWORDS:

Google; cyberchondria; history of medicine; self-diagnosis; sociology of diagnosis

PMID:
29536917
DOI:
10.1515/dx-2016-0045
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Sheridan PubFactory
Loading ...
Support Center