Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:275-286. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Feb 24.

The impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity derived from diffusion MRI.

Author information

1
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
2
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
3
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
4
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: sattertt@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Abstract

Multiple studies have shown that data quality is a critical confound in the construction of brain networks derived from functional MRI. This problem is particularly relevant for studies of human brain development where important variables (such as participant age) are correlated with data quality. Nevertheless, the impact of head motion on estimates of structural connectivity derived from diffusion tractography methods remains poorly characterized. Here, we evaluated the impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity using a sample of 949 participants (ages 8-23 years old) who passed a rigorous quality assessment protocol for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) acquired as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Structural brain networks were constructed for each participant using both deterministic and probabilistic tractography. We hypothesized that subtle variation in head motion would systematically bias estimates of structural connectivity and confound developmental inference, as observed in previous studies of functional connectivity. Even following quality assurance and retrospective correction for head motion, eddy currents, and field distortions, in-scanner head motion significantly impacted the strength of structural connectivity in a consistency- and length-dependent manner. Specifically, increased head motion was associated with reduced estimates of structural connectivity for network edges with high inter-subject consistency, which included both short- and long-range connections. In contrast, motion inflated estimates of structural connectivity for low-consistency network edges that were primarily shorter-range. Finally, we demonstrate that age-related differences in head motion can both inflate and obscure developmental inferences on structural connectivity. Taken together, these data delineate the systematic impact of head motion on structural connectivity, and provide a critical context for identifying motion-related confounds in studies of structural brain network development.

KEYWORDS:

Artifact; Confound; DTI; Development; Motion; Structural connectivity; dMRI

PMID:
29486323
PMCID:
PMC5911236
[Available on 2019-06-01]
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.041
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center