Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 1;143(3):508-514. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31334. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of melanoma: A Mendelian randomisation analysis.

Author information

1
Statistical Genetics Lab, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300, Herston road, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
2
Cancer Epidemiology and Services Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
3
Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.
4
Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, 2145, NSW, Australia.
5
Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
6
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
7
Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, mainly affecting populations of European ancestry. Some observational studies suggest that particular diets reduce melanoma risk, putatively through an increase in polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) consumption. However, interpretation of these observational findings is difficult due to residual confounding or reverse causality. To date, a randomized controlled trial has not been carried out to examine the relationship between PUFAs and melanoma. Hence, we performed a Mendelian randomisation (MR) study to evaluate the link between PUFAs and melanoma. To perform MR, we used summary results from the largest risk genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of melanoma, consisting of 12,874 cases and 23,203 controls. As instrumental variables we selected SNPs associated with PUFA levels from a GWAS meta-analysis of PUFA levels, from the CHARGE consortium. We used the inverse variance weighted method to estimate a causal odds ratio. To aid interpretation, we established a benchmark "large" predicted change in PUFAs in which, for example, an increase in docosahexaenoic acid (DPA) of 0.17 units (equal to 1 standard deviation) moves a person from the 17th percentile to the median. Raising PUFA levels by a large amount (increasing DPA by 0.17 units) only negligibly changed melanoma risk: odds ratio [OR] = 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96-1.10). Other PUFAs yielded similar results as DPA. Our MR analysis suggests that the effect of PUFA levels on melanoma risk is either zero or very small.

KEYWORDS:

Mendelian randomisation; melanoma; n-3 fatty acids; n-6 fatty acids; polyunsaturated fatty acids

PMID:
29473154
DOI:
10.1002/ijc.31334

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center