Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 23;9(5):5823-5833. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23629. eCollection 2018 Jan 19.

Comparison of the modified low-dose cytarabine and etoposide with decitabine therapy for elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy.

Author information

1
Department of Hematology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2
Department of Hematology, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
3
Department of Infectious Disease, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
4
Department of Hematology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

To overcome unsatisfactory results of classical low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) of cytarabine ≤20 mg twice daily (BID) subcutaneously for 10 days for patients with elderly acute myeloid leukemia (eAML), we evaluated a modified LDAC (mLDAC) of cytarabine 20 mg/m2 BID subcutaneously plus etoposide 50 mg BID orally for 14 days. To determine its feasibility, we compared outcomes of 77 and 42 eAML patients who received, respectively, mLDAC and decitabine (DAC; 20 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days), which has shown better outcomes compared to those of classical LDAC. Most of baseline characteristics of two groups were well balanced. The mLDAC group had a higher complete response (CR) rate compared to the DAC group (46.8% vs. 19.0%, P < 0.01). Unlike the classical LDAC, mLDAC induced CR in patients with adverse cytogenetics, with its rate similar to that of the DAC group (33.3% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.58). Meanwhile, mucositis, neutropenic fever and invasive aspergillosis were more frequently observed in the mLDAC group, with no difference in early mortality between two groups (P > 0.05). The median overall survival rates of the mLDAC and DAC groups were comparable (8.7 vs 8.3 months, respectively, P = 0.35), presumably because the advantage of higher CR rate in the mLDAC group was offset by beneficial effects of marrow response, which is observed dominantly in the DAC group. Our results suggested that the outcomes of classical LDAC could be improved by modest modifications, to be comparable to those of DAC.

KEYWORDS:

decitabine; elderly acute myeloid leukemia; etoposide; low-intensity chemotherapy; modified low-dose cytarabine

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Impact Journals, LLC Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center