Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul - Aug;8(4):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 24.

Intrapatient study comparing 3D printed bolus versus standard vinyl gel sheet bolus for postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy.

Author information

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada. Electronic address: james.robar@nshealth.ca.
2
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
3
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
4
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
5
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

This patient study evaluated the use of 3-dimensional (3D) printed bolus for chest wall radiation therapy compared with standard sheet bolus with regard to accuracy of fit, surface dose measured in vivo, and efficiency of patient setup. By alternating bolus type over the course of therapy, each patient served as her own control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS:

For 16 patients undergoing chest wall radiation therapy, a custom 5.0 mm thick bolus was designed based on the treatment planning computed tomography scan and 3D printed using polylactic acid. Cone beam computed tomography scanning was used to image and quantify the accuracy of fit of the 2 bolus types with regard to air gaps between the bolus and skin. As a quality assurance measure for the 3D printed bolus, optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry provided in vivo comparison of surface dose at 7 points on the chest wall. Durations of patient setup and image guidance were recorded and compared.

RESULTS:

In 13 of 16 patients, the bolus was printed without user intervention, and the median print time was 12.6 hours. The accuracy of fit of the bolus to the chest wall was improved significantly relative to standard sheet bolus, with the frequency of air gaps 5 mm or greater reduced from 30% to 13% (P < .001) and maximum air gap dimension diminished from 0.5 ± 0.3 to 0.3 ± 0.3 mm on average. Surface dose was within 3% for both standard sheet and 3D printed bolus. On average, the use of 3D printed bolus reduced the setup time from 104 to 76 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates 3D printed bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy improves fit of the bolus and reduces patient setup time marginally compared with standard vinyl gel sheet bolus. The time savings on patient setup must be weighed against the considerable time needed for the 3D printing process.

PMID:
29452866
DOI:
10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center