Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 16;13(2):e0192471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192471. eCollection 2018.

Effects of patterned peripheral nerve stimulation on soleus spinal motor neuron excitability.

Author information

1
FENNSI Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain.
2
Physiotherapy Department, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
3
Physiotherapy Department, Alcalá de Henares University, Alcalá de Henares Spain.
4
CINAC, HM Puerta del Sur, Hospitales de Madrid, Móstoles, Spain.
5
EMG and Motor Control Section, Neurology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
6
Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Salvador de Bahia, Brazil.
7
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
8
Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
9
Experimental Neurophysiology Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain.

Abstract

Spinal plasticity is thought to contribute to sensorimotor recovery of limb function in several neurological disorders and can be experimentally induced in animals and humans using different stimulation protocols. In healthy individuals, electrical continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) of the median nerve has been shown to change spinal motoneuron excitability in the cervical spinal cord as indexed by a change in mean H-reflex amplitude in the flexor carpi radialis muscle. It is unknown whether continuous TBS of a peripheral nerve can also shift motoneuron excitability in the lower limb. In 26 healthy subjects, we examined the effects of electrical TBS given to the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa on the excitability of lumbar spinal motoneurons as measured by H-reflex amplitude of the soleus muscle evoked by tibial nerve stimulation. Continuous TBS was given at 110% of H-reflex threshold intensity and compared to non-patterned regular electrical stimulation at 15 Hz. To disclose any pain-induced effects, we also tested the effects of TBS at individual sensory threshold. Moreover, in a subgroup of subjects we evaluated paired-pulse inhibition of H-reflex. Continuous TBS at 110% of H-reflex threshold intensity induced a short-term reduction of H-reflex amplitude. The other stimulation conditions produced no after effects. Paired-pulse H-reflex inhibition was not modulated by continuous TBS or non-patterned repetitive stimulation at 15 Hz. An effect of pain on the results obtained was discarded, since non-patterned 15 Hz stimulation at 110% HT led to pain scores similar to those induced by EcTBS at 110% HT, but was not able to induce any modulation of the H reflex amplitude. Together, the results provide first time evidence that peripheral continuous TBS induces a short-lasting change in the excitability of spinal motoneurons in lower limb circuitries. Future studies need to investigate how the TBS protocol can be optimized to produce a larger and longer effect on spinal cord physiology and whether this might be a useful intervention in patients with excessive excitability of the spinal motorneurons.

PMID:
29451889
PMCID:
PMC5815584
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0192471
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center