Human polyomavirus infection: Cytological and molecular diagnosis

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2017 Nov;63(11):943-945. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.943.

Abstract

Few studies directly compare urinary cytology with molecular methods for detecting BK and JC polyomaviruses. Reactivation of BKV infection is the main risk factor for the development of nephropathy in immunocompromised individuals. The limitation of the cytological method can be attributed to the stage where the infected cell does not have specific and sufficient morphological characteristics for a conclusive diagnosis and can be easily interpreted as degenerative alteration. Moreover, morphologically, it is not possible to differentiate the two types of viruses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), not only is a sensitive method, but also allows differentiation of viral types without quantification, and therefore is not indicative of nephropathy. According to the American Society of Nephrology, real-time PCR would be the gold standard to indicate nephropathy because it allows quantifying the number of viral copies.

MeSH terms

  • BK Virus / genetics
  • BK Virus / isolation & purification*
  • DNA, Viral / analysis
  • Humans
  • JC Virus / genetics
  • JC Virus / isolation & purification*
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Polyomavirus
  • Polyomavirus Infections / diagnosis
  • Polyomavirus Infections / virology*

Substances

  • DNA, Viral