Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018 Feb;16(2):174-181. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13431. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

The status of dermoscopy in Germany - results of the cross-sectional Pan-Euro-Dermoscopy Study.

Author information

1
Dermatology Practice and Teaching Facility, Konstanz, Germany.
2
Dermatology Practice, Lübeck, Germany.
3
Department of Dermatology II, Medical Center Thalkirchner Straße, Munich, Germany.
4
Dermatology Unit, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
5
Dermatology Department, Elias University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
6
Dermatology Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
7
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria.
8
Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
9
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Survey on the current status of dermoscopy in Germany.

METHODS:

In the context of a pan-European internet-based study (n = 7,480) conducted by the International Dermoscopy Society, 880 German dermatologists were asked to answer questions with respect to their level of training as well as their use and perceived benefit of dermoscopy.

RESULTS:

Seven hundred and sixty-two (86.6 %) participants practiced dermatology in a publicly funded health care setting; 98.4 % used a dermoscope in routine clinical practice. About 93 % (n = 814) stated to have had more than five years of experience in the use of dermoscopy. Dermoscopy was considered useful in the diagnosis of melanoma by 93.6 % (n = 824); for pigmented skin tumors, by 92.4 % (n = 813); in the follow-up of melanocytic lesions, by 88.6 % (n = 780); for non-pigmented lesions, by 71.4 % (n = 628), in the follow-up of non-melanocytic lesions, by 52.7 % (n = 464); and for inflammatory skin lesions, by 28.5 % (n = 251). Overall, 86.5 % (n = 761) of participants felt that - compared to naked-eye examination - dermoscopy increased the number of melanomas diagnosed; 77,7 % (n = 684) considered the number of unnecessary excisions of benign lesions to be decreased. Participants who personally felt that dermoscopy improved their ability to diagnose melanoma were significantly i) younger, ii) had been practicing dermatology for a shorter period of time, iii) were less commonly employed by an university-affiliated dermatology department, iv) were more frequently working in an office-based public health care setting, and v) had more frequently been trained in dermoscopy during their dermatology residency.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings presented herein ought to be integrated into future residency and continuing medical education programs with the challenge to improve dermato-oncological care and to expand the diagnostic spectrum of dermoscopy to include inflammatory skin diseases.

PMID:
29384261
DOI:
10.1111/ddg.13431
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center