Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 25;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0462-2.

The no-go zone: a qualitative study of access to sexual and reproductive health services for sexual and gender minority adolescents in Southern Africa.

Author information

1
Gender, Health and Justice Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa. alex.muller@uct.ac.za.
2
Gender, Health and Justice Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Adolescents have significant sexual and reproductive health needs. However, complex legal frameworks, and social attitudes about adolescent sexuality, including the values of healthcare providers, govern adolescent access to sexual and reproductive health services. These laws and social attitudes are often antipathetic to sexual and gender minorities. Existing literature assumes that adolescents identify as heterosexual, and exclusively engage in (heteronormative) sexual activity with partners of the opposite sex/gender, so little is known about if and how the needs of sexual and gender minority adolescents are met.

METHODS:

In this article, we have analysed data from fifty in-depth qualitative interviews with representatives of organisations working with adolescents, sexual and gender minorities, and/or sexual and reproductive health and rights in Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

RESULTS:

Sexual and gender minority adolescents in these countries experience double-marginalisation in pursuit of sexual and reproductive health services: as adolescents, they experience barriers to accessing LGBT organisations, who fear being painted as "homosexuality recruiters," whilst they are simultaneously excluded from heteronormative adolescent sexual and reproductive health services. Such barriers to services are equally attributable to the real and perceived criminalisation of consensual sexual behaviours between partners of the same sex/gender, regardless of their age.

DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION:

The combination of laws which criminalise consensual same sex/gender activity and the social stigma towards sexual and gender minorities work to negate legal sexual and reproductive health services that may be provided. This is further compounded by age-related stigma regarding sexual activity amongst adolescents, effectively leaving sexual and gender minority adolescents without access to necessary information about their sexuality and sexual and reproductive health, and sexual and reproductive health services.

KEYWORDS:

Adolescents; Criminalisation; HIV; Heteronormativity; LGBT; Service provision; Sexual and gender minorities; Sexual and reproductive health and rights; Southern Africa; Stigma

PMID:
29370809
PMCID:
PMC5784505
DOI:
10.1186/s12978-018-0462-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center