Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):436.e1-436.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Adherence to practice guidelines is associated with reduced referral times for patients with ovarian cancer.

Author information

1
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
2
Vermillion, Inc, Austin, TX.
3
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
4
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL. Electronic address: hyesook.chon@moffitt.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Patients with ovarian cancer tend to receive the highest quality of care at high-volume cancer centers with gynecological oncologists. However, the care that they receive prior to gynecological oncology consult has not been examined. We investigated the quantity and quality of care given to patients with ovarian cancer before being seen by a gynecological oncologist.

OBJECTIVE:

We evaluated the variability, quantity, and quality of diagnostic testing and physician-referral patterns prior to consultation with a gynecological oncologist, in women with suspicious pelvic masses seen on imaging.

STUDY DESIGN:

A chart review was performed on patients treated for ovarian cancer at a single institution from 2001 to 2014. We evaluated their workup in 4 categories, drawn from National Comprehensive Care Network guidelines: provider visits, abdominal/pelvic imaging, chest imaging, and tumor markers. Workup was classified as guideline adherent or guideline nonadherent.

RESULTS:

We identified 335 cases that met our criteria. In the provider visit category, 83.9% of patients received guideline-adherent workup: 77% in the abdominal/pelvic imaging, 98.2% in the chest imaging, and 95.2% in the tumor marker categories. Each patient's workup was assessed as a compilation of the 4 categories, yielding 65.7% patients as having received an adherent workup and 34.3% of workup as nonadherent to guidelines. The timeframe to see a gynecological oncologist for patients with guideline-adherent workup was significantly shorter than for those whose workup was nonadherant (20 vs 86 days, P < .001). A suspicious pelvic mass was identified by obstetrics-gynecology in only 23.9% of patients; 42.7% of patients did not have tumor marker testing before a gynecological oncologist consult. When an obstetrics-gynecology specialist discovered the suspicious pelvic mass, the remaining workup was more likely to be guideline adherent prior to gynecological oncologist referral than when initial imaging was not ordered by an obstetrics-gynecology specialist (P = .18). Survival was not significantly different (P = .103).

CONCLUSION:

With a guideline-adherent workup, including tumor marker testing, gynecological oncologist referral times can be shortened, minimizing cost inefficiencies and delays that can compromise the effectiveness of downstream care for patients with ovarian cancer. Guidelines should be disseminated beyond the obstetrics-gynecology field.

KEYWORDS:

clinical decision making; diagnostic techniques and procedures; ovarian cancer; referral and consultation

PMID:
29353030
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center