Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;53(3):e107-e112. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000997.

Association Between Cotinine-verified Smoking Status and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia.

Author information

1
Preventive Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital.
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

GOALS:

We evaluated the association of urinary cotinine-verified smoking status with the risk of colorectal neoplasia (CRN).

BACKGROUND:

Many studies have reported the association between the risk of CRN and smoking status, based on self-reported questionnaires. Although self-reported smoking status may be inaccurate, to our knowledge, no study has yet assessed the association between objective biomarkers of tobacco exposure and the risk of CRN.

STUDY:

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 96,806 asymptomatic examinees who underwent colonoscopy and urinary cotinine measurements as part of a health check-up. Cotinine-verified current smokers were participants having a urinary cotinine level ≥50 ng/mL.

RESULTS:

The mean participant age was 38.4 years, and the proportion of cotinine-verified current smokers was 23.0%. Cotinine-verified current smoking was an independent risk factor for CRN [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-1.56] and advanced CRN (ACRN) (AOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.57-2.05). Moreover, the risk of CRN and ACRN increased with increasing cotinine levels. Among self-reported never smokers, cotinine-verified current smokers had a higher risk of CRN (AOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.57-2.00) and ACRN (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37-2.74) than cotinine-verified never smokers did, whereas among self-reported current smokers, cotinine-verified never smokers had a lower risk of CRN (AOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87) and ACRN (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98) than cotinine-verified current smokers did.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cotinine-captured smoking status and metabolic variation exhibit associations with CRN more accurately and objectively than self-reporting does, providing clearer evidence for the role of tobacco in the development of CRN.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center