Reliability and agreement on embryo assessment: 5 years of an external quality control programme

Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Mar;36(3):259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Abstract

An external quality-control programme for morphology-based embryo quality assessment, incorporating a standardized embryo grading scheme, was evaluated over a period of 5 years to determine levels of inter-observer reliability and agreement between practising clinical embryologists at IVF centres and the opinions of a panel of experts. Following Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies, the Gwet index and proportion of positive (Ppos) and negative agreement were calculated. For embryo morphology assessment, a substantial degree of reliability was measured between the centres and the panel of experts (Gwet index: 0.76; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.84). The agreement was higher for good- versus poor-quality embryos. When multinucleation or vacuoles were observed, low levels of reliability were obtained (Ppos: 0.56 and 0.43, respectively). In blastocysts, the characteristic that presented the largest discrepancy was that related to the inner cell mass. In decisions about the final disposition of the embryo, reliability between centre and the panel of experts was moderate (Gwet index: 0.51; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.60). In conclusion, the ability of clinical embryologists to evaluate the presence of multinucleation and vacuoles in the early cleavage embryo, and to determine the category of the inner cell mass in blastocysts, needs to be improved.

Keywords: ART; Agreement; Embryo assessment; IVF; Quality control; Reliability.

MeSH terms

  • Blastocyst / ultrastructure*
  • Embryo, Mammalian / ultrastructure*
  • Embryonic Development*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Quality Control*
  • Reproducibility of Results