Send to

Choose Destination
Regen Med. 2018 Jan;13(1):19-27. doi: 10.2217/rme-2017-0115. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

The FDA and the US direct-to-consumer marketplace for stem cell interventions: a temporal analysis.

Author information

Department of Cell Biology & Human Anatomy, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Institute of Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospital For Children Northern California, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Center for Bioethics, School of Public Health, & College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, N504 Boynton, 410 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.


Hundreds of businesses in the US currently advertise a wide range of non-US FDA-approved stem cell interventions. Here we present a novel systematic temporal analysis of US companies engaged in direct-to-consumer marketing of putative stem cell treatments. Between 2009 and 2014, the number of new US stem cell businesses with websites grew rapidly, at least doubling on average every year. From 2014 to 2016, approximately 90-100 new stem cell business websites appeared per year. In contrast, from 2012 to the present, regulatory activity in the form of FDA warning letters has been limited. These data point to a problematic disconnect between a rapidly expanding US direct-to-consumer stem cell industry and limited FDA oversight of this marketplace. More consistent, timely and effective FDA actions are urgently needed.


FDA; adipose stem cells; amniotic stem cells; bone marrow stem cells; direct-to-consumer advertising; patient safety; stem cell clinics

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center