Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jan 3;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2595-5.

Co-infections with multiple genotypes of Anaplasma marginale in cattle indicate pathogen diversity.

Author information

1
Vectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
2
Biotechnology Platform, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa.
3
Research and Scientific Services Department, National Zoological Gardens of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
4
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
5
Inqaba Biotechnical Industries, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.
6
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
7
Present Address: National Research Foundation, Brummeria, Pretoria, South Africa.
8
Present Address: Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
9
Vectors and Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. nicola.collins@up.ac.za.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Only a few studies have examined the presence of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in South Africa, and no studies have comprehensively examined these species across the whole country. To undertake this country-wide study we adapted a duplex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for use in South Africa but found that one of the genes on which the assay was based was variable. Therefore, we sequenced a variety of field samples and tested the assay on the variants detected. We used the assay to screen 517 cattle samples sourced from all nine provinces of South Africa, and subsequently examined A. marginale positive samples for msp1α genotype to gauge strain diversity.

RESULTS:

Although the A. marginale msp1β gene is variable, the qPCR functions at an acceptable efficiency. The A. centrale groEL gene was not variable within the qPCR assay region. Of the cattle samples screened using the assay, 57% and 17% were found to be positive for A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively. Approximately 15% of the cattle were co-infected. Msp1α genotyping revealed 36 novel repeat sequences. Together with data from previous studies, we analysed the Msp1a repeats from South Africa where a total of 99 repeats have been described that can be attributed to 190 msp1α genotypes. While 22% of these repeats are also found in other countries, only two South African genotypes are also found in other countries; otherwise, the genotypes are unique to South Africa.

CONCLUSIONS:

Anaplasma marginale was prevalent in the Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga and absent in the Northern Cape. Anaplasma centrale was prevalent in the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal and absent in the Northern Cape and Eastern Cape. None of the cattle in the study were known to be vaccinated with A. centrale, so finding positive cattle indicates that this organism appears to be naturally circulating in cattle. A diverse population of A. marginale strains are found in South Africa, with some msp1α genotypes widely distributed across the country, and others appearing only once in one province. This diversity should be taken into account in future vaccine development studies.

KEYWORDS:

Next-generation amplicon sequencing; groEL; msp1α; msp1β; qPCR

PMID:
29298712
PMCID:
PMC5753507
DOI:
10.1186/s13071-017-2595-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center