Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Sep;18(2):72-145. doi: 10.1177/1529100617727266.

Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).

Author information

1
1 Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.
2
2 Research Domain Criteria Unit, National Institute of Mental Health.
3
3 Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
4
4 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine.
5
5 Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization.
6
6 Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University Medical Center.

Abstract

The diagnosis of mental disorder initially appears relatively straightforward: Patients present with symptoms or visible signs of illness; health professionals make diagnoses based primarily on these symptoms and signs; and they prescribe medication, psychotherapy, or both, accordingly. However, despite a dramatic expansion of knowledge about mental disorders during the past half century, understanding of their components and processes remains rudimentary. We provide histories and descriptions of three systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorder. Two major diagnostic manuals-the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-provide classification systems relevant to public health, clinical diagnosis, service provision, and specific research applications, the former internationally and the latter primarily for the United States. In contrast, the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria provides a framework that emphasizes integration of basic behavioral and neuroscience research to deepen the understanding of mental disorder. We identify four key issues that present challenges to understanding and classifying mental disorder: etiology, including the multiple causality of mental disorder; whether the relevant phenomena are discrete categories or dimensions; thresholds, which set the boundaries between disorder and nondisorder; and comorbidity, the fact that individuals with mental illness often meet diagnostic requirements for multiple conditions. We discuss how the three systems' approaches to these key issues correspond or diverge as a result of their different histories, purposes, and constituencies. Although the systems have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, they share the goal of reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder.

KEYWORDS:

DSM; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; ICD; International Classification of Diseases; RDoC; Research Domain Criteria; classification; diagnosis; mental disorder

Comment in

PMID:
29211974
DOI:
10.1177/1529100617727266
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center