Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Dec 1;109(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx118.

Concordance of Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Metastatic Tissue Biopsy in Prostate Cancer.

Author information

1
Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Medicine and Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacremento, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.

Abstract

Background:

Real-time knowledge of the somatic genome can influence management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). While routine metastatic tissue biopsy is challenging in mCRPC, plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive tool to sample the tumor genome. However, no systematic comparisons of matched "liquid" and "solid" biopsies have been performed that would enable ctDNA profiling to replace the need for direct tissue sampling.

Methods:

We performed targeted sequencing across 72 clinically relevant genes in 45 plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples collected at time of metastatic tissue biopsy. We compared ctDNA alterations with exome sequencing data generated from matched tissue and quantified the concordance of mutations and copy number alterations using the Fisher exact test and Pearson correlations.

Results:

Seventy-five point six percent of cfDNA samples had a ctDNA proportion greater than 2% of total cfDNA. In these patients, all somatic mutations identified in matched metastatic tissue biopsies were concurrently present in ctDNA. Furthermore, the hierarchy of variant allele fractions for shared mutations was remarkably similar between ctDNA and tissue. Copy number profiles between matched liquid and solid biopsy were highly correlated, and individual copy number calls in clinically actionable genes were 88.9% concordant. Detected alterations included AR amplifications in 22 (64.7%) samples, SPOP mutations in three (8.8%) samples, and inactivating alterations in tumor suppressors TP53 , PTEN , RB1 , APC , CDKN1B , BRCA2 , and PIK3R1 . In several patients, ctDNA sequencing revealed robust changes not present in paired solid biopsy, including clinically relevant alterations in the AR, WNT, and PI3K pathways.

Conclusions:

Our study shows that, in the majority of patients, a ctDNA assay is sufficient to identify all driver DNA alterations present in matched metastatic tissue and supports development of DNA biomarkers to guide mCRPC patient management based on ctDNA alone.

PMID:
29206995
PMCID:
PMC6440274
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/djx118
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center