Considerations for using minocycline vs doxycycline for treatment of canine heartworm disease

Parasit Vectors. 2017 Nov 9;10(Suppl 2):493. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2449-1.

Abstract

Background: Doxycycline has been considered the first drug of choice for treating Wolbachia, a member of the Rickettsiaceae, which has a symbiotic relationship with filarial worms, including heartworms. Wolbachia, is susceptible to tetracyclines, which have been used as adjunctive treatments for heartworm disease. Treatment with doxycycline reduces Wolbachia numbers in all stages of heartworms and improves outcomes and decreased microfilaremia in dogs treated for heartworm disease. The American Heartworm Society recommends treatment with doxycycline in dogs diagnosed with heartworm disease at a dose of 10 mg/kg twice daily for 28 days. If doxycycline is not available, minocycline can be considered as a substitute. However, minocycline has not undergone an evaluation in dogs with heartworm disease, nor has an effective dose been established. Minocycline is an attractive option because of the higher cost of doxycycline and new pharmacokinetic information for dogs that provides guidance for appropriate dosage regimens to achieve pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets.

Results: Published reports from the Anti-Wolbachia Consortium (A-WOL) indicate superior in vitro activity of minocycline over doxycycline. Studies performed in mouse models to measure anti-Wolbachia activity showed that minocycline was 1.7 times more effective than doxycycline, despite a 3-fold lower pharmacokinetic exposure. To achieve the same exposure as achieved in the mouse infection model, a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis was conducted to determine optimal dosages for dogs. The analysis showed that an oral minocycline dose of 3.75 to 5 mg/kg administered twice daily would attain similar targets as observed in mice and predicted for human infections.

Conclusions: There are potentially several advantages for use of minocycline in animals. It is well absorbed from oral administration, it has less protein binding than doxycycline (65% vs 92%) allowing for better distribution into tissue, and it is approximately two times more lipophilic than doxycycline, which may result in better intracellular penetration. More work is needed to document efficacy of minocycline for treating canine heartworm disease.

Keywords: Doxycycline; Heartworm; Minocycline; Monte Carlo simulation; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Wolbachia.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacokinetics
  • Dirofilaria immitis / microbiology*
  • Dirofilaria immitis / physiology
  • Dirofilariasis / drug therapy*
  • Dirofilariasis / parasitology
  • Dog Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Dog Diseases / parasitology
  • Dogs
  • Doxycycline / administration & dosage*
  • Doxycycline / pharmacokinetics
  • Mice
  • Minocycline / administration & dosage*
  • Minocycline / pharmacokinetics
  • Wolbachia / drug effects*
  • Wolbachia / physiology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Minocycline
  • Doxycycline