Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Nov 13;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0689-5.

"I'm not strong enough; I'm not good enough. I can't do this, I'm failing"- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers' experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support.

Author information

1
University of New South Wales (UNSW), National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), 22-32 King Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. v.boland@unsw.edu.au.
2
University of New South Wales (UNSW), National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), 22-32 King Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
3
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, London, UK.
4
Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The social gradient in smoking rates persist with an overrepresentation of smoking and its associated harms concentrated within lower socioeconomic status (SES) populations. Low-SES smokers are motivated to quit but face multiple barriers when engaging a quit attempt. An understanding of the current treatment service model from the perspectives of treatment-seeking low-SES smokers is needed to inform the design of alternative smoking cessation support services tailored to the needs of low-SES populations. This qualitative study aimed to: i) explore low-SES smokers' recent quitting experiences; ii) assess factors that impact treatment engagement; and iii) determine the acceptability and feasibility of alternative approaches to smoking cessation.

METHOD:

Low-SES participants (n = 24) previously enrolled in a smoking cessation RCT participated in either a semi-structured focus group or in-depth telephone interview. Data was obtained and analysed using thematic analysis from October 2015 to June 2016. Analysis was deductive from the interview guide and supplemented inductively.

RESULTS:

Participants expressed feelings of guilt and shame around their smoking behaviour and experienced stigmatisation for their smoking. Guilt, shame, and stigmatisation negatively impacted treatment seeking behaviours with most avoiding current quit services. Costs of pharmacotherapy and treatment adherence were commonly cited barriers to treatment success. Electronic-cigarettes were perceived to be unsafe due to uncertainty on their legal status and regulatory restrictions. Technology-based text-messaging quit support was endorsed as a more favourable alternative compared to existing behavioural treatment services.

CONCLUSION:

Stigmatisation was commonly endorsed and acted as an impediment to current treatment utilisation. Electronic-cigarettes may present a viable harm reduction alternative, but their likely uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in Australia is limited by smokers' uncertainty about their regulation and legality. Mobile phone based cessation support may provide an alternative to telephone counselling and overcome the stigmatisation low-SES smokers face while trying to quit.

KEYWORDS:

Cessation support; Electronic cigarettes; Qualitative; Smoking cessation; mHealth

PMID:
29132364
PMCID:
PMC5683575
DOI:
10.1186/s12939-017-0689-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center