Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Vasc Med. 2017 Nov 1:1358863X17740993. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17740993. [Epub ahead of print]

How to become proficient in performance of the resting ankle-brachial index: Results of the first randomized controlled trial.

Author information

1
1 Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
2
2 Université de Rennes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1414, Rennes, France.
3
3 Vascular Medicine, Hopital de Saint-Malo, France.
4
4 Vascular Medicine, Hospital de Dinan, France.
5
5 Vascular Medicine, Hospital de Paimpol, France.
6
6 Movement, Sport and Health Laboratory, EA 1274, UFR STAPS, Université de Rennes 2, Rennes, France.
7
7 Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Ecole normale supérieure de Rennes, Bruz, France.

Abstract

The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a first-line test to diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD). No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet been conducted to determine the best teaching method to become proficient in the ABI procedure. We conducted a monocentric RCT to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improved proficiency in the ABI procedure. Medical students ( n = 30) received didactic learning, including (i) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and (ii) a video demonstration. Each student was then randomized into two groups ('no experiential learning group' and 'experiential learning group'). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and a final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he or she performed a correct ABI procedure on a healthy individual and a patient. The correct procedure corresponds to (i) following guidelines and (ii) a difference in ABI measurement between a vascular specialist and a student of ≤ 0.15. No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, in the didactic learning group, the number of proficient students was not improved compared with the initial evaluation (0/10 vs 1/10). In the experiential learning group, the number of proficient students was significantly improved (0/20 vs 11/20; p < 0.05). At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students depending on their learning group. In conclusion, didactic learning alone is insufficient to gain proficiency in the ABI procedure. Combining didactic learning with experiential learning significantly improved the students' proficiency.

KEYWORDS:

ankle-brachial index (ABI); diagnosis; medical education; peripheral artery disease (PAD); randomized controlled trial (RCT); teaching; vascular medicine training

PMID:
29125051
DOI:
10.1177/1358863X17740993
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center