Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Stimulus-invariant auditory cortex threat encoding during fear conditioning with simple and complex sounds.

Author information

1
Division of Clinical Psychiatry Research, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Centre Zurich, 8057, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
2
Division of Clinical Psychiatry Research, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Centre Zurich, 8057, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychsosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1 3BG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dominik.bach@uzh.ch.

Abstract

Learning to predict threat depends on amygdala plasticity and does not require auditory cortex (ACX) when threat predictors (conditioned stimuli, CS) are simple sine tones. However, ACX is required in rodents to learn from some naturally occurring CS. Yet, the precise function of ACX, and whether it differs for different CS types, is unknown. Here, we address how ACX encodes threat predictions during human fear conditioning using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with multivariate pattern analysis. As in previous rodent work, CS+ and CS- were defined either by direction of frequency modulation (complex) or by frequency of pure tones (simple). In an instructed non-reinforcement context, different sets of simple and complex sounds were always presented without reinforcement (neutral sounds, NS). Threat encoding was measured by separation of fMRI response patterns induced by CS+/CS-, or similar NS1/NS2 pairs. We found that fMRI patterns in Heschl's gyrus encoded threat prediction over and above encoding the physical stimulus features also present in NS, i.e. CS+/CS- could be separated better than NS1/NS2. This was the case both for simple and complex CS. Furthermore, cross-prediction demonstrated that threat representations were similar for simple and complex CS, and thus unlikely to emerge from stimulus-specific top-down, or learning-induced, receptive field plasticity. Searchlight analysis across the entire ACX demonstrated further threat representations in a region including BA22 and BA42. However, in this region, patterns were distinct for simple and complex sounds, and could thus potentially arise from receptive field plasticity. Strikingly, across participants, individual size of Heschl's gyrus predicted strength of fear learning for complex sounds. Overall, our findings suggest that ACX represents threat predictions, and that Heschl's gyrus contains a threat representation that is invariant across physical stimulus categories.

KEYWORDS:

Auditory cortex; Fear conditioning; Functional MRI (fMRI); Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA); Threat prediction

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center