Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov;33(11):748-753. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001303.

Management of the Febrile Young Infant: Update for the 21st Century.

Author information

1
*Fellow (Woll), Assistant Professor (Aronson), Departments of Pediatrics and of Emergency Medicine, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and †Associate Professor (Neuman), Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abstract

Infants aged 90 days or younger with fever are frequently evaluated in the pediatric emergency department. Physical examination findings and individual laboratory investigations are not reliable to differentiate benign viral infections from serious bacterial infections in febrile infants. Clinical prediction models were developed more than 25 years ago and have high sensitivity but relatively low specificity to identify bacterial infections in febrile infants. Newer laboratory investigations such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have favorable test characteristics compared with traditional laboratory studies such as a white blood cell count. These novel biomarkers have not gained widespread acceptance because of lack of robust prospectively collected data, varying thresholds to define positivity, and differing inclusion criteria across studies. However, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, when combined with other patient characteristics in the step-by-step approach, have a high sensitivity for detection of serious bacterial infection. The RNA biosignatures are a novel biomarker under investigation for detection of bacterial infection in febrile infants.

PMID:
29095773
PMCID:
PMC5679412
DOI:
10.1097/PEC.0000000000001303
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center