Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Nutr. 2018 Feb;57(1):25-49. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1546-4. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

Systematic review of the effects of the intestinal microbiota on selected nutrients and non-nutrients.

Author information

1
Johnson & Johnson EAME, Foundation Park, Maidenhead, SL6 3UG, UK. CShortt@its.jnj.com.
2
DuPont Nutrition and Health, c/o Danisco (UK) Ltd., 43 London Road, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 9PW, UK.
3
Mondelēz France R&D, 6 Rue René Razel, 91400, Saclay, France.
4
FrieslandCampina, Stationsplein 4, 3818 LE, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
5
Nofima Hovedkontor, Muninbakken 9-13, Breivika Postboks 6122, Langnes, 9291, Tromsø, Norway.
6
University of Applied Sciences, FH Campus Wien, 1100, Vienna, Austria.
7
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK.
8
Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
9
Yakult Germany, Forumstraße 2, 41468, Neuss, Germany.
10
Cargill R&D Centre Europe, Havenstraat 84, 1800, Vilvoorde, Belgium.
11
Danone Research, Route Départementale 128, 91767, Palaiseau Cedex, France.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

There is considerable interest in the effects of the intestinal microbiota (IM) composition, its activities in relation with the metabolism of dietary substrates and the impact these effects may have in the development and prevention of certain non-communicable diseases. It is acknowledged that a complex interdependence exists between the IM and the mammalian host and that the IM possesses a far greater diversity of genes and repertoire of metabolic and enzymatic capabilities than their hosts. However, full knowledge of the metabolic activities and interactions of the IM and the functional redundancy that may exist are lacking. Thus, the current review aims to assess recent literature relating to the role played by the IM in the absorption and metabolism of key nutrients and non-nutrients.

METHODS:

A systematic review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42015019087) was carried out focussing on energy and the following candidate dietary substrates: protein, carbohydrate, fat, fibre, resistant starch (RS), and polyphenols to further understand the effect of the IM on the dietary substrates and the resulting by-products and host impacts. Particular attention was paid to the characterisation of the IM which are predominantly implicated in each case, changes in metabolites, and indirect markers and any potential impacts on the host.

RESULTS:

Studies show that the IM plays a key role in the metabolism of the substrates studied. However, with the exception of studies focusing on fibre and polyphenols, there have been relatively few recent human studies specifically evaluating microbial metabolism. In addition, comparison of the effects of the IM across studies was difficult due to lack of specific analysis/description of the bacteria involved. Considerable animal-derived data exist, but experience suggests that care must be taken when extrapolating these results to humans. Nevertheless, it appears that the IM plays a role in energy homeostasis and that protein microbial breakdown and fermentation produced ammonia, amines, phenols and branch chain fatty acids, and a greater diversity in the microbes present. Few recent studies appear to have evaluated the effect of the IM composition and metabolism per se in relation with digestible dietary carbohydrate or fat in humans. Intakes of RS and prebiotics altered levels of specific taxa that selectively metabolised specific prebiotic/carbohydrate-type substances and levels of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were observed to increase. In controlled human studies, consistent data exist that show a correlation between the intake of fibre and an increase in bifidobacteria and short-chain fatty acids, in particular butyrate, which leads to lower intestinal pH. Dietary polyphenols rely on modification either by host digestive enzymes or those derived from the IM for absorption to occur. In the polyphenol-related studies, a large amount of inter-individual variation was observed in the microbial metabolism and absorption of certain polyphenols.

CONCLUSIONS:

The systematic review demonstrates that the IM plays a major role in the breakdown and transformation of the dietary substrates examined. However, recent human data are limited with the exception of data from studies examining fibres and polyphenols. Results observed in relation with dietary substrates were not always consistent or coherent across studies and methodological limitations and differences in IM analyses made comparisons difficult. Moreover, non-digestible components likely to reach the colon are often not well defined or characterised in studies making comparisons between studies difficult if not impossible. Going forward, further rigorously controlled randomised human trials with well-defined dietary substrates and utilizing omic-based technologies to characterise and measure the IM and their functional activities will advance the field. Current evidence suggests that more detailed knowledge of the metabolic activities and interactions of the IM hold considerable promise in relation with host health.

KEYWORDS:

Dietary substrates; Intestinal microbiota; Metabolism; Metabolites

PMID:
29086061
PMCID:
PMC5847024
DOI:
10.1007/s00394-017-1546-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center