Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Nurs. 2017 Oct 16;16:60. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0253-z. eCollection 2017.

Support pressure distribution for positioning in neutral versus conventional positioning in the prevention of decubitus ulcers: a pilot study in healthy participants.

Author information

St. Mauritius Therapieklinik, Bereich Motorik, Strümper Straße 111, 40670 Meerbusch, Germany.
Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.



Decubitus ulcers are associated with a burden for the patients and cause enormous costs. One of the reasons for the development of decubitus is prolonged exposure to pressure. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the pressure distribution of healthy individuals either positioned in Positioning in Neutral (LiN) or conventional positioning (CON).


Four healthy participants were positioned in a supine, 30° degree side lying and 90° side lying position both in LiN and CON. A thousand pressure sensors in a mattress enabled a visual presentation of low, medium and high pressure on a screen. This presentation was processed by Photoshop in order to count the pixels representing the total support pressure surface and the pressure intensity.


LiN showed, on average, a smaller surface with measurable pressure compared to CON (46,293 versus 64,090 pixels). The areas of medium pressure were comparable. Mean areas of low and high pressure were both smaller in LiN as compared to CON (low: 8315 versus 22,790 pixels; high: 3744 versus 7277 pixels).


The results of this pilot study indicate that LiN is suitable for pressure sore prophylaxis because LiN showed less support surface and less maximum pressure as compared to CON.


Decubitus; Positioning; Positioning in neutral; Pressure distribution; Pressure measurement

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center