Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Proteins. 2018 Mar;86 Suppl 1:152-167. doi: 10.1002/prot.25409. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

Assessment of the model refinement category in CASP12.

Author information

1
Department of Chemistry, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
2
Genome Center, University of California, Davis, California, 95616.
3
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Abstract

We here report on the assessment of the model refinement predictions submitted to the 12th Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP12). This is the fifth refinement experiment since CASP8 (2008) and, as with the previous experiments, the predictors were invited to refine selected server models received in the regular (nonrefinement) stage of the CASP experiment. We assessed the submitted models using a combination of standard CASP measures. The coefficients for the linear combination of Z-scores (the CASP12 score) have been obtained by a machine learning algorithm trained on the results of visual inspection. We identified eight groups that improve both the backbone conformation and the side chain positioning for the majority of targets. Albeit the top methods adopted distinctively different approaches, their overall performance was almost indistinguishable, with each of them excelling in different scores or target subsets. What is more, there were a few novel approaches that, while doing worse than average in most cases, provided the best refinements for a few targets, showing significant latitude for further innovation in the field.

KEYWORDS:

CASP; CASP12; enhanced sampling algorithms; model refinement; molecular dynamics; protein structure prediction

PMID:
29071750
DOI:
10.1002/prot.25409
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center