Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 25;17(11). pii: E2445. doi: 10.3390/s17112445.

Arrhythmia Evaluation in Wearable ECG Devices.

Author information

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Innovation Center for Big Data and Digital Convergence, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan. muammarsadrawi@yahoo.com.
2
Healthcare and Beauty RD Center, Kinpo Electronics, Inc., New Taipei City 222, Taiwan. lance_lin@kinpo.com.tw.
3
Healthcare and Beauty RD Center, Kinpo Electronics, Inc., New Taipei City 222, Taiwan. lotusytlin@calcomp.com.tw.
4
Healthcare and Beauty RD Center, Kinpo Electronics, Inc., New Taipei City 222, Taiwan. yita_hsieh@calcomp.com.tw.
5
Healthcare and Beauty RD Center, Kinpo Electronics, Inc., New Taipei City 222, Taiwan. cckuo@calcomp.com.tw.
6
Healthcare and Beauty RD Center, Kinpo Electronics, Inc., New Taipei City 222, Taiwan. jcchien@kinpo.com.tw.
7
Healthcare and Beauty RD Center, Kinpo Electronics, Inc., New Taipei City 222, Taiwan. koichi_h@kinpo.com.tw.
8
Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. Maysam.Abbod@brunel.ac.uk.
9
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Innovation Center for Big Data and Digital Convergence, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan. jsshieh@saturn.yzu.edu.tw.

Abstract

This study evaluates four databases from PhysioNet: The American Heart Association database (AHADB), Creighton University Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia database (CUDB), MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database (MITDB), and MIT-BIH Noise Stress Test database (NSTDB). The ANSI/AAMI EC57:2012 is used for the evaluation of the algorithms for the supraventricular ectopic beat (SVEB), ventricular ectopic beat (VEB), atrial fibrillation (AF), and ventricular fibrillation (VF) via the evaluation of the sensitivity, positive predictivity and false positive rate. Sample entropy, fast Fourier transform (FFT), and multilayer perceptron neural network with backpropagation training algorithm are selected for the integrated detection algorithms. For this study, the result for SVEB has some improvements compared to a previous study that also utilized ANSI/AAMI EC57. In further, VEB sensitivity and positive predictivity gross evaluations have greater than 80%, except for the positive predictivity of the NSTDB database. For AF gross evaluation of MITDB database, the results show very good classification, excluding the episode sensitivity. In advanced, for VF gross evaluation, the episode sensitivity and positive predictivity for the AHADB, MITDB, and CUDB, have greater than 80%, except for MITDB episode positive predictivity, which is 75%. The achieved results show that the proposed integrated SVEB, VEB, AF, and VF detection algorithm has an accurate classification according to ANSI/AAMI EC57:2012. In conclusion, the proposed integrated detection algorithm can achieve good accuracy in comparison with other previous studies. Furthermore, more advanced algorithms and hardware devices should be performed in future for arrhythmia detection and evaluation.

KEYWORDS:

arrhythmia; artificial neural networks; fast Fourier transform; sample entropy; wearable sensor

PMID:
29068369
PMCID:
PMC5712868
DOI:
10.3390/s17112445
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center