Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Nucl Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s12149-017-1216-x. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Low levels of PSMA expression limit the utility of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for imaging urothelial carcinoma.

Author information

1
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
2
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
3
Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
4
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
5
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mgorin1@jhmi.edu.
6
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mgorin1@jhmi.edu.
7
Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mgorin1@jhmi.edu.
8
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mgorin1@jhmi.edu.
9
, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. mgorin1@jhmi.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the clinical utility of PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS:

Three patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were imaged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. All lesions with perceptible radiotracer uptake above background were considered positive. Maximum standardized uptake values were recorded for each detected lesion and findings on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were compared to those on conventional imaging studies. To further explore PSMA as a molecular target of urothelial carcinoma, RNA-sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to compare the relative expression of PSMA among cases of bladder cancer, prostate cancer, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Additionally, immunohistochemical staining for PSMA was performed on a biopsy specimen from one of the imaged patients.

RESULTS:

18F-DCFPyL PET/CT allowed for the detection of sites of urothelial carcinoma, albeit with low levels of radiotracer uptake. Analysis of RNA-sequencing data revealed that bladder cancer had significantly lower levels of PSMA expression than both prostate cancer and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Consistent with this observation, immunohistochemical staining of tissue from one of the imaged patients demonstrated a low level of neovascularization and nearly absent PSMA expression.

CONCLUSION:

The relatively scant expression of PSMA by urothelial carcinoma likely limits the utility of PSMA-targeted PET imaging of this malignancy. Future research efforts should focus on the development of other molecularly targeted imaging agents for urothelial carcinoma.

KEYWORDS:

18F-DCFPyL PET/CT; Bladder cancer; PSMA; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Transitional cell carcinoma; Urothelial carcinoma

PMID:
29067547
PMCID:
PMC5881395
DOI:
10.1007/s12149-017-1216-x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center