Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):304-314. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12985. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Adaptive social impact management for conservation and environmental management.

Author information

1
Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
2
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
3
Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Monterey, CA, U.S.A.

Abstract

Concerns about the social consequences of conservation have spurred increased attention the monitoring and evaluation of the social impacts of conservation projects. This has resulted in a growing body of research that demonstrates how conservation can produce both positive and negative social, economic, cultural, health, and governance consequences for local communities. Yet, the results of social monitoring efforts are seldom applied to adaptively manage conservation projects. Greater attention is needed to incorporating the results of social impact assessments in long-term conservation management to minimize negative social consequences and maximize social benefits. We bring together insights from social impact assessment, adaptive management, social learning, knowledge coproduction, cross-scale governance, and environmental planning to propose a definition and framework for adaptive social impact management (ASIM). We define ASIM as the cyclical process of monitoring and adaptively managing social impacts over the life-span of an initiative through the 4 stages of profiling, learning, planning, and implementing. We outline 14 steps associated with the 4 stages of the ASIM cycle and provide guidance and potential methods for social-indicator development, predictive assessments of social impacts, monitoring and evaluation, communication of results, and identification and prioritization of management responses. Successful ASIM will be aided by engaging with best practices - including local engagement and collaboration in the process, transparent communication of results to stakeholders, collective deliberation on and choice of interventions, documentation of shared learning at the site level, and the scaling up of insights to inform higher-level conservation policies-to increase accountability, trust, and perceived legitimacy among stakeholders. The ASIM process is broadly applicable to conservation, environmental management, and development initiatives at various scales and in different contexts.

KEYWORDS:

adaptive management; bienestar humano; ciencia social de la conservación; conservation social science; human well-being; manejo adaptativo; monitoreo y evaluación; monitoring and evaluation; social impact assessment; valoración del impacto social

PMID:
29063710
DOI:
10.1111/cobi.12985

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center