Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Nov;58(6):1177-1185. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.6.1177.

Effect of Sagittal Balance on Risk of Falling after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Combined with Posterior Surgery.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Catholic-Kwandong University, Incheon, Korea.
2
Institue for Bio-Medical Convergence, College of Medicine, Catholic-Kwandong University, Incheon, Korea.
3
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
4
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. shmoon@yuhs.ac.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To demonstrate the impact of correcting sagittal balance (SB) on functional outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal disease and actual falls via utilization of new minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques via a lateral approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

From November 2011 to March 2015, we enrolled 56 patients who underwent minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and matched 112 patients receiving decompression/postero-lateral fusion (PLF) surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. According to SB status using C7-plumb line-distance (C7PL) and surgery type, patients were divided into three groups: SB PLF, sagittal imbalance (SI) PLF, and LLIF groups. We then compared their outcomes.

RESULTS:

The mean C7PL was 6.2±13.6 mm in the SB PLF group, 72.9±33.8 mm in the SI PLF group, and 74.8±38.2 mm in the LLIF group preoperatively. Postoperatively, C7PL in only the LLIF group improved significantly (p=0.000). Patients in the LLIF group showed greater improvement in fall-related functional test scores than the SI PLF group (p=0.007 for Alternate-Step test, p=0.032 for Sit-to-Stand test). The average number of postoperative falls was 0.4±0.7 in the SB PLF group, 1.1±1.4 in the SI PLF group, and 0.8±1.0 in the LLIF group (p=0.041). Oswestry Disability Index and the Euro-QoL 5 dimension visual analogue scale scores also showed greater improvements in the LLIF group than in the SI PLF group at postoperative 1 year (p=0.003, 0.016).

CONCLUSION:

Surgical correction of SI in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a combination of minimal invasive LLIF and posterior surgery achieved better surgical outcomes and a lower incidence of actual falls than PLF surgery.

KEYWORDS:

Lumbar spinal stenosis; actual falls; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; outcome; sagittal balance; surgery

PMID:
29047242
PMCID:
PMC5653483
DOI:
10.3349/ymj.2017.58.6.1177
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Yonsei University College of Medicine Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center