Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):793-798. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.053. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

Perioperative outcomes after reoperative carotid endarterectomy are worse than expected.

Author information

1
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
2
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: jeffrey.siracuse@bmc.org.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Reoperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be technically challenging because of significant scarring as a consequence of the initial CEA procedure. There are limited data that describe outcomes after reoperative CEA, and as such, our goal was to determine the effect of reoperative CEA on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS:

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was queried for patients undergoing index and reoperative CEA between 2005 and 2014. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the effect of reoperative CEA on outcomes including stroke, major adverse cardiovascular event, and procedure time.

RESULTS:

There were 75,943 index and 140 reoperative CEAs identified. No differences were found in baseline demographics or comorbidities except that the reoperative group had a higher incidence of patients with end-stage renal disease (3.6% vs 1.1%; P = .004). Prior stroke with deficit (20.8% vs 15.4%; P = .137) and without deficit (11.5% vs 9.1%; P = .43) were similar between reoperative and index CEA groups. Both the reoperative and index initial CEA cohorts had comparable rates of surgical site infection (0.7% vs 0.3%; P = .462), return to the operating room (3.6% vs 4%; P = .816), readmission with 30 days (2.1% vs 6.9%; P = .810), myocardial infarction (2.1% vs 0.9%; P = .125), and perioperative death (0.7% vs 0.9%; P = .853). The reoperative cohort had a significantly higher rate of perioperative stroke (5.0% vs 1.6%; P = .002) and a longer operative duration (137 ± 54 vs 116 ± 49 minutes; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that reoperative CEA was an independent factor for postoperative stroke (odds ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-8.57; P = .002), major adverse cardiovascular event (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.32-5.78; P = .007), and longer procedure time (means ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Reoperative carotid surgery is associated with a longer operative time and higher risk for perioperative stroke compared with index CEA. This information informs the risk-benefit analysis for reoperation.

Comment in

PMID:
29042076
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.053
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center