Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Aug 16;2:63. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12259.1. eCollection 2017.

Sharing individual patient and parasite-level data through the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network platform: A qualitative case study.

Author information

1
Visiting Senior Research Fellow, The Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
2
Independent research analyst, Oxford, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Increasingly, biomedical researchers are encouraged or required by research funders and journals to share their data, but there's very little guidance on how to do that equitably and usefully, especially in resource-constrained settings. We performed an in-depth case study of one data sharing pioneer: the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN).

METHODS:

The case study included a records review, a quantitative analysis of WAARN-related publications, in-depth interviews with 47 people familiar with WWARN, and a witness seminar involving a sub-set of 11 interviewees.

RESULTS:

WWARN originally aimed to collate clinical, in vitro, pharmacological and molecular data into linked, open-access databases intended to serve as a public resource to guide antimalarial drug treatment policies. Our study describes how WWARN navigated challenging institutional and academic incentive structures, alongside funders' reluctance to invest in capacity building in malaria-endemic countries, which impeded data sharing. The network increased data contributions by focusing on providing free, online tools to improve the quality and efficiency of data collection, and by inviting collaborative authorship on papers addressing policy-relevant questions that could only be answered through pooled analyses. By July 1, 2016, the database included standardised data from 103 molecular studies and 186 clinical trials, representing 135,000 individual patients. Developing the database took longer and cost more than anticipated, and efforts to increase equity for data contributors are on-going. However, analyses of the pooled data have generated new methods and influenced malaria treatment recommendations globally. Despite not achieving the initial goal of real-time surveillance, WWARN has developed strong data governance and curation tools, which are now being adapted relatively quickly for other diseases.

CONCLUSIONS:

To be useful, data sharing requires investment in long-term infrastructure. To be feasible, it requires new incentive structures that favour the generation of reusable knowledge.

KEYWORDS:

LMIC; WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network; bioinformatics; data sharing; global health; incentives; research collaboration; research infrastructure

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Neither of the investigators are Oxford employees, and no staff of WWARN or Oxford University had any part in the analysis or interpretation of the study data, nor in the writing of this paper, though they did have an opportunity to check a near-final draft for accuracy. EP has received consultancy fees from Oxford University, including for work on data sharing. SB declares no competing interests.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for F1000 Research Ltd Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center