Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0185970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185970. eCollection 2017.

Behavioral testing of minipigs transgenic for the Huntington gene-A three-year observational study.

Author information

1
George-Huntington-Institute, Technology-Park, Muenster, Germany.
2
Institute of Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
3
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Technology and Management, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
4
Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Muenster, Germany.
5
Institute of Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behavior, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
6
Laboratory of Cell Regeneration and Plasticity, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, v.v.i., AS CR, Libechov, Czech Republic.
7
Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Large animal models of Huntington's disease (HD) may increase the reliability of translating preclinical findings to humans. Long live expectancy offers opportunities particularly for disease modifying approaches, but also challenges. The transgenic (tg) HD minipig model assessed in this study exhibits a high genetic homology with humans, similar body weight, and comparable brain structures. To test long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of novel therapeutic approaches in this model reliable assessments applicable longitudinally for several years are warranted for all phenotypical domains relevant in HD.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate whether the tests proposed assessing motor, cognitive and behavioral domains can be applied repetitively over a 3-year period in minipigs with acceptable variability or learning effects and whether tgHD minipigs reveal changes in these domains compared to wildtype (wt) minipigs suggesting the development of an HD phenotype.

METHODS:

A cohort of 14 tgHD and 18 wt minipigs was followed for three years. Tests applied every six months included a tongue coordination and hurdle test for the motor domain, a color discrimination test for cognition, and a dominance test for assessing behavior. Statistical analyses were performed using repeated ANOVA for longitudinal group comparisons and Wilcoxon-tests for intra-visit differences between tgHD and wt minipigs.

RESULTS:

All tests applied demonstrated feasibility, acceptable variance and good consistency during the three-year period. No significant differences between tgHD and wt minipigs were detected suggesting lack of a phenotype before the age of four years.

CONCLUSIONS:

The assessment battery presented offers measures in all domains relevant for HD and can be applied in long-term phenotyping studies with tgHD minipigs. The observation of this cohort should be continued to explore the timeline of phenotype development and provide information for future interventional studies.

PMID:
29016656
PMCID:
PMC5633197
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0185970
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center