Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Sep;5(17):341. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.04.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing routine hepatectomy: review of the current evidence.

Author information

1
Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
2
Department of Surgery, Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Enhanced recovery protocols are widely used in many areas of general surgery but had a limited penetration in perioperative management of patients undergoing liver resection. Recently, multiple publications described application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program to hepatectomy patients but their definitive role is not established or accepted by hepatobiliary surgeons.

METHODS:

A comprehensive literature review of published series in English language medical sources detailing ERAS program application for hepatectomy for the period of 2006-2016 is performed.

RESULTS:

ERAS protocols are feasible and safe. They reduce length of stay in patients undergoing routine hepatectomy without negative impact on morbidity and mortality. There is potential for reduction of Clavien grade I-II complications, while major and surgical complications are similar to traditional care management group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Application of ERAS program to patient undergoing hepatectomy reduces length of hospital stay without affecting perioperative morbidity or mortality and may represent a new standard of care for patients undergoing routine liver resection.

KEYWORDS:

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); hepatectomy; review

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for AME Publishing Company Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center