Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 20;17(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2735-8.

Who's holding the baby? A prospective diary study of the contact patterns of mothers with an infant.

Author information

1
Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. patricia.campbell@unimelb.edu.au.
2
Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia. patricia.campbell@unimelb.edu.au.
3
Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
4
Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
5
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
6
School of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Models of infectious disease are increasingly utilising empirical contact data to quantify the number of potentially infectious contacts between age groups. While a growing body of data is being collected on contact patterns across many populations, less attention has been paid to the social contacts of young infants. We collected information on the social contacts of primary carers of young infants and investigated their potential for use as a proxy for contacts made by their infant.

METHODS:

We recruited primary carers of infants under one year of age residing in two geographically, demographically and socioeconomically distinct local government areas of Melbourne, Australia - Boroondara and Hume - including a sub-group of Turkish-speaking participants. Participants recorded their own contacts in a paper diary and noted whether their infant was present or absent. Information collected included times at an address; description of location; and details on people contacted at the location. Descriptive summary measures and distributions of contacts by location type, intensity, day of contact and by age are reported.

RESULTS:

Of the 226 participants recruited, 220 completed diaries were returned. Participant contact patterns were similar across all groups, with respect to the types of locations, intensity and day of contact, with some variation in the number of unique daily contacts. The infant was present at around 85% of locations at which the primary carer contacted other individuals. The majority of contacts occurring when the infant was present were in Own Home (32%), Retail and Hospitality (18%) and Transport (18%) settings. The mean daily number of unique contacts by infants was estimated as 9.1, 8.7 and 6.5 in Boroondara, Hume (English) and Hume (Turkish), respectively, with a similar age distribution across each of our surveyed groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our demonstration that contact patterns of mothers with infants are reasonably robust to socioeconomic and cultural differences is a step forward in modelling infectious disease transmission. With infants spending most of their time in the company of their mother, contact patterns of mothers are a useful proxy measure of infant contact patterns. The age distribution of contacts made by infants estimated in this study may be used to supplement population-wide contact information commonly used in infectious disease transmission models.

KEYWORDS:

Contact patterns; Infants; Population characteristics; Social networks; Socioeconomic factors

PMID:
28931390
PMCID:
PMC5607568
DOI:
10.1186/s12879-017-2735-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center