Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):652-678. doi: 10.3945/an.117.015941. Print 2017 Sep.

Perspective: An Extension of the STROBE Statement for Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): Explanation and Elaboration.

Author information

1
Department of Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
2
Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
3
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
4
Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
5
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
6
Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
7
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
8
Department of Biosciences and Food Sciences, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
9
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, and.
10
Biostatistics Unit, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
11
Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
12
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

Nutritional epidemiology is an inherently complex and multifaceted research area. Dietary intake is a complex exposure and is challenging to describe and assess, and links between diet, health, and disease are difficult to ascertain. Consequently, adequate reporting is necessary to facilitate comprehension, interpretation, and generalizability of results and conclusions. The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement is an international and collaborative initiative aiming to enhance the quality of reporting of observational studies. We previously presented a checklist of 24 reporting recommendations for the field of nutritional epidemiology, called "the STROBE-nut." The STROBE-nut is an extension of the general STROBE statement, intended to complement the STROBE recommendations to improve and standardize the reporting in nutritional epidemiology. The aim of the present article is to explain the rationale for, and elaborate on, the STROBE-nut recommendations to enhance the clarity and to facilitate the understanding of the guidelines. Examples from the published literature are used as illustrations, and references are provided for further reading.

KEYWORDS:

checklist; dietary assessment; epidemiology; nutrition; reference standards; scientific reporting

PMID:
28916567
PMCID:
PMC5593101
DOI:
10.3945/an.117.015941
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: AH, CB, EF, C Larsson, ES, AÅ, C Lachat, DH, PK, GB, WDK, JVC, JEC, DCG, NS, MC, ME, IH, and EW, no conflicts of interest. JEC is Principal Investigator and DCG is Co-Investigator on a grant from the Medical Research Council (MR/L02019X/1) that is looking at ways to improve the quality of dietary assessment. MC acted as coordinator of the STROBE collaboration.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center