Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 30;8:1366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01366. eCollection 2017.

Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots.

Author information

1
Social Systems Laboratory, Computer Science, University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyEdinburg, TX, United States.
2
Emotion, Brain, and Behavior Laboratory, Psychology, Tufts UniversityMedford, MA, United States.
3
Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford UniversityStanford, CA, United States.
4
Social Cognition Laboratory, Psychology, Tufts UniversityMedford, MA, United States.
5
Social Identity and Stigma Laboratory, Psychology, Tufts UniversityMedford, MA, United States.
6
Robots in Groups Laboratory, Information Science, Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY, United States.

Abstract

Robots intended for social contexts are often designed with explicit humanlike attributes in order to facilitate their reception by (and communication with) people. However, observation of an "uncanny valley"-a phenomenon in which highly humanlike entities provoke aversion in human observers-has lead some to caution against this practice. Both of these contrasting perspectives on the anthropomorphic design of social robots find some support in empirical investigations to date. Yet, owing to outstanding empirical limitations and theoretical disputes, the uncanny valley and its implications for human-robot interaction remains poorly understood. We thus explored the relationship between human similarity and people's aversion toward humanlike robots via manipulation of the agents' appearances. To that end, we employed a picture-viewing task (Nagents = 60) to conduct an experimental test (Nparticipants = 72) of the uncanny valley's existence and the visual features that cause certain humanlike robots to be unnerving. Across the levels of human similarity, we further manipulated agent appearance on two dimensions, typicality (prototypic, atypical, and ambiguous) and agent identity (robot, person), and measured participants' aversion using both subjective and behavioral indices. Our findings were as follows: (1) Further substantiating its existence, the data show a clear and consistent uncanny valley in the current design space of humanoid robots. (2) Both category ambiguity, and more so, atypicalities provoke aversive responding, thus shedding light on the visual factors that drive people's discomfort. (3) Use of the Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale did not reveal any significant relationships between people's pre-existing attitudes toward humanlike robots and their aversive responding-suggesting positive exposure and/or additional experience with robots is unlikely to affect the occurrence of an uncanny valley effect in humanoid robotics. This work furthers our understanding of both the uncanny valley, as well as the visual factors that contribute to an agent's uncanniness.

KEYWORDS:

anthropomorphism; emotion regulation; human-robot interaction; humanoid robots; social robotics; uncanny valley

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center